Human in the viz-loop

On 14 December 2016 at Computing Insight UK http://www.stfc.ac.uk/ciuk with over 250 delegates and suppliers present I had the opportunity to discuss areas of human-vis within HPC – few tweets on the vis presentation (so far). The specific example of the IMAT beamline was used, but the past four years usage were considered. Thanks to Srikanth Nagella, Erica Yang and Martin Turner; Peter Oliver, Callum Williams, Joe Kelleher, Genoveva Burca, Triestino Minniti, Winfried Kockelmann

Abstract for CIUK Presentation

Energy selective imaging detectors with over 10MP sensors have been incorporated within large science laboratories allowing high-quality materials at the micro- (10-6 m) or nano- (10-9 m) scales analysis but creating a large data problem. A service for neutron analysis is being offered by the IMAT (Imaging and Materials Science & Engineering) instrument, at the ISIS pulsed neutron source in the UK. ULTRA is a compute intensive HPC platform enabling high-throughput neutron tomographic image data analysis so that images can be scrutinised during an experiment rather than as a batch-mode post-process operation.

Dataflow Problem:

Unlike normal computed tomography (CT) scans used in hospitals where one 2D image is acquired for each ‘shot’ (a rotation angle), in energy selective neutron imaging, an image stack comprising of potentially thousands of 2D images are collected at each ‘shot’. So for the MCP camera , capable of collecting 3,000 images per angle where each image uniquely corresponds to one of the 3,000 energy bands; this results in 0.3 million images during a 100 angle experiment.

New Materials Science Analysis:

The reason this is carried out is that neutron interactions can vary drastically with neutron energy for certain materials, allowing for chemistry discrimination [2]. The amount of neutrons that is able to penetrate through a material and reach the image detectors, namely, neutron intensity, is strongly affected by the crystalline structures and microstructures of a material, exhibiting Bragg edges [1]. The computational reconstruction needs to be near interactive as each peak represents a potential energy band region suitable for HPC reconstruction.

Creating a bespoke HPC engine:

A specific HPC-based analysis and visualisation technology is being employed to enable this new mode of operation. Traditionally, a typical 3D reconstruction takes mins, using the Filtered Back Projection algorithm (FBP) [3], one of the most common and fast algorithm. However, in energy selective imaging, the reconstructions need to be performed repetitively across selected energy ranges and as signal to noise levels are lower, iterative algorithms, which are much slower than the FBP algorithm are required and can take >100s of minutes to run.

ULTRA has been constructed to receive the data to a STFC HPC cluster, a distance of about a mile, on demand from the experimental facility and process the data directly – this then allows for different interaction modes gives instantaneous feedback for example through small mpeg movie clips, as well as final results transmitted by remote visualisation from the login node via paraview. Using the Savu pipeline , a python based dataflow mechanism, different options of filtering, reconstruction and presentation can be incorporated . We will explain the specific cluster based HPC hardware setup that includes GPU based login nodes designed to minimise data movement.

For the scientists the insights obtained through this analysis process is then used to steer the next experiment step, for example, to adjust sample positions and beam alignment, or to decide whether to use different reconstruction algorithms or parameters, or image filters.

Video Outreach:

We created a video that will be presented and described to help others develop a better understanding to create this kind of hardware/software dataflow experiment. A dataset is transferred (using the open source test date – SophiaBeads dataset [4], a microCT dataset), captured, reconstructed using the FBP algorithm from the TomoPy image reconstruction toolkit [6] running on a single node with 128GB RAM, 12 CPU cores using the STFC’s large HPC cluster, SCARF and then segmented using the algorithms available in the commercial software package Avizo [5].

[1] T. Minniti et. al., “Material analysis opportunities on the new neutron imaging facility IMAT@ISIS”, Journal of Instrumentation, Volume 11, March 2016, IOP Publishing Ltd and Sissa Medialab srl.
[2] J. Santisteban et. al., “Time-of-Flight neutron transmission diffraction”, J. Appl. Cryst. 34 (2001) 289.
[3] Peter Toft, “The Radon Transform – Theory and Implementation”, Ph.D. thesis. Department of Mathematical Modelling, Technical University of Denmark, June 1996.
[4] Sophia Bethany Coban, “SophiaBeads Datasets Project Documentation and Tutorials”, April 2015, MIMS EPrint: 2015.26.
[5] Avizo 9. “Avizo User’s Guide”, FEI Visualisation Sciences Group.
[6] Doǧa Gürsoy, Francesco De Carlo, Xianghui Xiao, and Chris Jacobsen, “TomoPy: a framework for the analysis of synchrotron tomographic data”, J Synchrotron Radiat. 2014 Sep 1; 21(Pt 5): 1188–1193. DOI: 10.1107/S1600577514013939.

WING and a prayer

To do interactive visualisation you need an input device – fairly obvious statement but often been ignored and just the humble keyboard and mouse are used. Although, there are many novel devices over the decade last year we have brought one of the Wing devices a combined joystick and mouse. This was linked to the Drishti volume visualiser with a python layer that would then calibrate and smooth interactions allowing for different rates of response.

This means one single hand of a user has a 6DOF (degree of freedom): allowing for x-y-z along with roll-pitch-yaw operations.So you can move and rotate an object in one smooth operation. The other hand can be used to hold your coffee cup.

Details of the poster we, Martin Turner, Tim Morris and Mario Sandoval, presented is at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.154515

At the stand we asked people for various use cases that included:

  1. Control of an objects clipping plane – rotation allows the angle of the clipping-plane to be changed and the x direction moves the clipping-plane in the normal direction cropping the required part of the volume datasets.
  2. Controlling a light source; where rotation controls the direction that the virtual light source points and x-y controls the colour of the light as described by a colour wheel.
  3. Controlling viewing between multiple transfer functions: so moving in x direction blends between one of a list of pre-defined transfer functions.
  4. Controlling various parameters on a transfer function’s curves and points.

Next question was if you could have two Wing devices you now have >12 DOF available simultaneously in movements of two hands.

MT

Poster and stand at the ToScA 2016 event held in the University of Bath, September 2016.

Being Ironman

On the Visualisation Room at the Atlas Building in the Harwell Campus, Srikanth Nagella installed the Avizo VR Module – that allows full tracking and experimented on Tomographic Data:

  • Full immersive 3D interaction;
  • Support for single and multiple screens;
  • Support for single and multi-pipe and for graphic clusters;
  • Flexible customization for specific display geometry;
  • Head-tracking and tracked hand-held 3D input devices;
  • Control functionality via user interface; and
  • Control of 2D user interfaces with 3D devices (virtual mouse).

p20150424_007_9p40

WP_20150424_004m

Restructuring and starting a “new” Visualisation Group

The SCD within STFC is having Away Days in April and collated together with a five year plan for the complete Department. The Visualisation Group has a technology division strategy outline and operational plan but produces a list of future areas of support that include the concept of keeping the Human always within the Visuallsation loop.

Key Activities

The Visualisation Group, part of the Technology Division within SCD, was founded to support and maintain visualisation software and skills for large projects and user communities.

This has included working;

  • with the Hartree Centre hosting their visualisation centres connecting outputs from some of the largest computer in the UK making them human understandable;
  • with the Innovate UK’s Space Application Catapult and European Space Agency (ESA) producing bespoke solutions for their data analytical and command and control needs;
  • creating remote and distance data gathering and visualisation workflows to control the computational processes and
  • providing specialist local high-end equipment within the centres that are near to the main STFC image capturing x-ray, neutron and laser facilities.

Human in the Loop

The group is working to support the high-end visualisation centres within STFC, with the key objective to consider the human-in-the-loop as an integral part to pre- mid- and post-data visualisation needs from the major facilities, from archived data stores and from computational simulations. This it is believed is a key component to increasing the efficiency of the major STFC facilities allowing researchers’ work-plans to be controlled, changed and even stopped on the fly.

The group has an emphasis to work in harmony with collaborators across the STFC mission. To this end there are links to partners;

  • as well as the major imaging facilities (ISIS, Diamond Light Source, and Central Lasers Facility) and the Hartree Centre this includes the
  • Virtual Engineering Centre (University of Liverpool centre based in the Daresbury Labs.),
  • the Harwell Imaging Partnership (based in the RAL campus),
  • the Collaborative Computational Projects (CCPs based across SCD) and a
  • range of Research Council projects with other teams and groups within SCD and STFC.

An image of the initial posters shown here:

VisGrp_A0P_Poster02-15_mt2_fin

Visualisation User Needs Survey

At the end of 2014 we analysed a Visualisation Tools survey for certain HPC and computational users.

UserNeedsSurvey

The results from over 100 respondents are being edited at:
http://www.vizmatters.cs.manchester.ac.uk/

Executive summary states; for the global survey there were seven key outcome results that can be acted upon:

  • Three packages are the most-used packages by 26% of respondents. Conversely, another 31 packages are used by one or two users and account for a further 26% of respondents.
  • Producing publication quality plots is the most-used technique.
    However, the features making these packages the favourites are:
    – Software that is written specifically for their domain of interest.
    – Large datasets are handled efficiently.
    – Scripting or other ability to extend the tool is required.
  • Users second most favoured packages are general purpose visualisation tools.
  • Users were given five options for selecting their most required development. None emerged as being more needed than the others.
  • Conversely, large amounts of memory was clearly the most important requirement for high performance visualisation.
  • The main future challenges are suggested to be
    – The ability to handle large amounts of data
    – The ability to operate in a distributed environment.

A series of further surveys and follow-up questions are planned as well as afull review next October (2015).

SciVis4All a consortium for the future from EuroVis 2014

During EuroVis 2014 in June at the University of Swansea we had post dinner and then extended discussion meeting regarding the possibility of considering Visualisation as a CCP in itself or as a cross-service role to other CCPs.

1. The conference hosted about 250 people so there is a vibrant and large community which would be active in supporting. The UK component is a good size and this year it was reported that there was a significant increase in interest from a range of UK universities.

EuroVis Conference Dinner - June 2014 held at Swansea

EuroVis Conference Dinner – June 2014 held at Swansea

2. There is alterntaive networks within the UK including the Eurographics UK Chapter: who could support and assist in further network development. They also represent 10 or so people across the two main communities of Computer Graphics and Visualisation. A recent survey has involved trying to define the distinction between these two main groups.

Question is what is the key software deliverables;

  1. information visualisation or scientific visualisation – or both.
  2. specific API toolkit or major product including interface etc.
  3. web-based portal type programming or stand-alone application
  4. how localised a network of developers vs users

 

Swansea City is meant to be the wettest city in the UK- and we had to suffer the 30 min walk across the wilderness from the hotel to the university; there and back every day.

Gorgous sunshine on beach walk to University of Swansea from hotel during EuroVis 2014.

Gorgeous sunshine on the beach walk to the University of Swansea from our hotel during EuroVis 2014.